WebsiteDesignOutsource.com blog
A Reduced Motion Review for Outsourced Website Design
A practical guide to reduced motion for an outsourced website design project.
Document which transitions communicate state and which can be shortened or removed for visitors who prefer less motion. A useful brief gives the design team a clear visitor task and gives the reviewer evidence they can inspect on the working page.
Start with the visitor task
Reduced motion should answer one concrete question for a named visitor. Write the expected action, the information needed to take it, and the state that proves the page has helped. This keeps a visual preference from becoming the only measure of success.
Specify the states that matter
Document the normal, narrow-screen, keyboard, error, empty, and returning-visitor states that apply. Include the approved content, relevant assets, responsive constraints, and the person who can resolve an open decision. Review carousels, menus, dialogs, loading indicators, and scroll effects. Preserve the information and control while reducing movement, and test the preference on the assembled page.
Review the assembled route
Ask the outsourced team to provide the working route or an accessible prototype. Check the task at a narrow viewport, with keyboard navigation and zoom, then record the route, state, observed result, expected result, and owner for each change.
Close with a useful handoff
The handoff should name the approved version, source files, page owner, unresolved follow-ups, and next review point. That context lets the next contributor maintain the decision without reconstructing it from scattered messages.
Further reading
Read the website content brief guide
Read the responsive website design guide
Source
https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/animation-from-interactions.html
Frequently asked questions
What belongs in this brief?
Include the visitor, task, affected routes, required states, approved inputs, constraints, acceptance evidence, and decision owner. Keep implementation details that affect the outcome visible to the reviewer.
Is a screenshot enough to approve it?
No. Use the assembled interaction and inspect the states that matter, including narrow layouts, keyboard access, errors, and the final content.